Peer Review Policy

The "Al-Zumar Research Journal" is committed to publishing high-quality, original research papers that contribute significantly to the advancement of knowledge in various fields. To ensure the quality and rigor of published articles, the journal adheres to a strict and transparent peer review policy.

2. Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process. This means that the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept anonymous throughout the process.

3. Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field and their publication history. The editor-in-chief, in consultation with the editorial board, selects reviewers who are qualified to assess the manuscript's originality, significance, methodology, results, and conclusions.

4. Reviewers' Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

• Provide a fair and objective assessment of the manuscript based on its scientific merit and adherence to the journal's guidelines.
• Identify any potential ethical issues or conflicts of interest.
• Clearly articulate their comments and suggestions for improvement in a constructive and respectful manner.
• Maintain the confidentiality of the peer review process.

5. Authors' Responsibilities

Authors are expected to:

• Submit manuscripts that are original and not under consideration by any other publication.
• Ensure that their manuscripts adhere to the journal's formatting and submission guidelines.
• Respond to reviewers' comments and suggestions in a timely and professional manner.
• Address any ethical concerns raised by the reviewers.

6. Timeline for Review

The editorial team strives to provide authors with a decision on their manuscript within 4-6 weeks of submission. However, this timeline may vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the availability of reviewers.